You get these points in matches with 5 tricks, where the team that scores the most points and tricks wins. ***** "Play this! I love this game.There is always a trump and your objective is to score 10 or more points. ***** "The opponents are good players unlike other hearts games." ***** "Without a doubt the best game of Hearts!" This app is identical to our free app but does not contain any ads. * Simple tutorial to help beginners get in the game fast * Automatic game saving, just in case you get a call right before shooting the moon * Challenging and competitive computer opponents * Achievements, some easy, some hard, can you get them all? * Game options, including "Jack of Diamonds" * Realistic look and feel, just like sitting at a card table! * Play Hearts online with your friends and everyone else! It's fast, stable, always improving, and, above all, fun! Top Features include: Hearts+ has been in development for years by a dedicated team and has seen countless new features, improvements, and bug fixes. Why would I subject myself to that? Looking for a new app. ![]() The law of averages tells me the deal is not random.I enjoy the game of Hearts very much but this makes it no fun. This results in me eating the Queen more than half the time because with only 2 spades in hand with one being the Q, K or A after passing cards, I’m screwed. My game deteriorated in a matter of weeks (300 rating points down) because I get shorted spades on the deal 9 out of 10 hands. I’ve read others accuse the developers of bias if you don’t buy tokens. Or they quit with one trick left on the final hand also causing a delay. ![]() People are rude and quit after one bad hand making the rest of us wait for a timeout before an AI replacement is added. I played the single game AI version for years and at the hardest level was able to win about 40% of the time, although their card play choices are predictable making it easier to shoot the moon.Just started playing multiplayer rated games a couple months ago and that has driven me to delete the app. I will be shopping around for another version. Now its started the vicious decline, where no matter my strategy, I cannot win a game.Just wish the app dealt cards fairly and randomly, as the user experience of multi player is pretty decent. I believe this is the seeding phase where the developers hope you will spend for in app purchases when your rating is skyrocketing. I stopped playing for about 2 years, and when I came back, my draws were phenomenal, and my rating increased by ~400 pts. Also, the developers may see the extreme ups and downs of ratings as a retention feature, keeping user hooked (I know, cynical, but I suspect it’s true). It’s maddening.In both modes, this leads to wild swings in results where you’ll lose 15-20 straight games, with no chance of winning based on initial deal.i think they are pushing users to buy tokens for more favorable cards. I’ve played this game for several years, and while it is at times a great time waster, the multi player and single player modes are tainted by very obvious manipulation of dealt hands. I would say, don’t purchase the no adds version, it’s not worth it for Hearts but Spades is a fantastic game. I was hopeful for this game but it is wildly unrealistic, poorly tested and not very well thought out in regards to all levels of skill based play. Will come after you the real player even if you are loosing where on a real table, every player goes after and typically teams against lowest score to give them time to level the scores and possibly gain the upper hand. ![]() The simplest answer is the easiest, So, it knows your cards. It’s not intuitive, it’s clear by the sheer amount of times That it throws the worst card for you at the worst time. While I love a challenge a novice just trying to learn the game is going to throw this game away. This publishers Spades game is fantastic !! This game “ Hearts “ is terrible !! I played 50 games on all 3 difficulties.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |